Ranker
The Godfather
Administrator
Kool Aid Distribution King
   
DKP: +19/-11
Offline
Posts: 6000
|
 |
« on: December 29, 2007, 05:53:46 PM » |
|
http://www.digg.com/2008_us_elections/Ron_Paul_Does_Not_Accept_Evolution_2http://informationparadox.blogspot.com/2007/12/ron-paul-does-not-accept-evolution.htmlAhhh, good to know that we have another Bible thumping SCIENCE DENYING presidential candidate to vote for. As if we didn't learn our lesson the first time... Ron Paul also doesn't accept a woman's right to choose, the concept of the separation of church and state, and an individual's right to privacy in sexual matters. Take a look at his "We The People Act" if you don't believe me: The Supreme Court of the United States and each Federal court-- (1) shall not adjudicate-- (A) any claim involving the laws, regulations, or policies of any State or unit of local government relating to the free exercise or establishment of religion; (B) any claim based upon the right of privacy, including any such claim related to any issue of sexual practices, orientation, or reproduction; or (C) any claim based upon equal protection of the laws to the extent such claim is based upon the right to marry without regard to sex or sexual orientation; and http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c109:h4379: All of this directly contradicts the First Amendment and the Fourteenth Amendment which guarantees all citizens equal protection under the law. Ron Paul isn't a Libertarian or a Constitutionalist. In reality, he's a far right-wing, fundamentalist, deconstructionist who would like to turn the country into a theocracy. I would really like to hear the Ron Paul supporters answer to this, if they have one?
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: December 29, 2007, 06:01:54 PM by Ranker »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Roco
Retired Mafia
Posting Like It's My Birthday
DKP: +14/-6
Offline
Posts: 2639
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: December 30, 2007, 06:32:50 PM » |
|
While we're on the topic, for the love of god don't vote for Mike Huckabee. The last thing we need is another evangelical christian running the country.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
prammy
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: December 30, 2007, 07:11:44 PM » |
|
I'd vote for Giuliani before I vote for Huckabee. Huckabee if elected will become like High Chancellor Sutler in V for Vendetta.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Daemok
Retired Mafia
Posting Like It's My Birthday
DKP: +23/-13
Online
Posts: 2495
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: December 31, 2007, 09:53:36 AM » |
|
And you think Goulliani wouldn't be a Sutter from V.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 Ahhh F*cking HOFF-STYLE!!!
|
|
|
|
prammy
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: December 31, 2007, 12:47:47 PM » |
|
And you think Goulliani wouldn't be a Sutter from V.
It was meant to say how ridiculous I think Huckabee is. I lived in NYC when Giuliani was mayor and know how bad he can be in a position of authority.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: December 31, 2007, 12:53:33 PM by prammy »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
sitzkrieg
|
 |
« Reply #6 on: January 03, 2008, 11:08:35 AM » |
|
http://www.digg.com/2008_us_elections/Ron_Paul_Does_Not_Accept_Evolution_2http://informationparadox.blogspot.com/2007/12/ron-paul-does-not-accept-evolution.htmlAhhh, good to know that we have another Bible thumping SCIENCE DENYING presidential candidate to vote for. As if we didn't learn our lesson the first time... Ron Paul also doesn't accept a woman's right to choose, the concept of the separation of church and state, and an individual's right to privacy in sexual matters. Take a look at his "We The People Act" if you don't believe me: The Supreme Court of the United States and each Federal court-- (1) shall not adjudicate-- (A) any claim involving the laws, regulations, or policies of any State or unit of local government relating to the free exercise or establishment of religion; (B) any claim based upon the right of privacy, including any such claim related to any issue of sexual practices, orientation, or reproduction; or (C) any claim based upon equal protection of the laws to the extent such claim is based upon the right to marry without regard to sex or sexual orientation; and http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c109:h4379: All of this directly contradicts the First Amendment and the Fourteenth Amendment which guarantees all citizens equal protection under the law. Ron Paul isn't a Libertarian or a Constitutionalist. In reality, he's a far right-wing, fundamentalist, deconstructionist who would like to turn the country into a theocracy. I would really like to hear the Ron Paul supporters answer to this, if they have one? So much for the republican ticket. Guiliani... you'd have to pay me to vote for him, and the rest I wouldn't piss on if they were on fire. The democrat ticket isn't any better either  edit: The chick Hillary Clinton is allegedly banging is pretty fucking hot.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: January 03, 2008, 11:32:13 AM by sitzkrieg »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Ranker
The Godfather
Administrator
Kool Aid Distribution King
   
DKP: +19/-11
Offline
Posts: 6000
|
 |
« Reply #7 on: January 03, 2008, 12:04:06 PM » |
|
http://www.digg.com/2008_us_elections/Ron_Paul_Does_Not_Accept_Evolution_2http://informationparadox.blogspot.com/2007/12/ron-paul-does-not-accept-evolution.htmlAhhh, good to know that we have another Bible thumping SCIENCE DENYING presidential candidate to vote for. As if we didn't learn our lesson the first time... Ron Paul also doesn't accept a woman's right to choose, the concept of the separation of church and state, and an individual's right to privacy in sexual matters. Take a look at his "We The People Act" if you don't believe me: The Supreme Court of the United States and each Federal court-- (1) shall not adjudicate-- (A) any claim involving the laws, regulations, or policies of any State or unit of local government relating to the free exercise or establishment of religion; (B) any claim based upon the right of privacy, including any such claim related to any issue of sexual practices, orientation, or reproduction; or (C) any claim based upon equal protection of the laws to the extent such claim is based upon the right to marry without regard to sex or sexual orientation; and http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c109:h4379: All of this directly contradicts the First Amendment and the Fourteenth Amendment which guarantees all citizens equal protection under the law. Ron Paul isn't a Libertarian or a Constitutionalist. In reality, he's a far right-wing, fundamentalist, deconstructionist who would like to turn the country into a theocracy. I would really like to hear the Ron Paul supporters answer to this, if they have one? So much for the republican ticket. Guiliani... you'd have to pay me to vote for him, and the rest I wouldn't piss on if they were on fire. The democrat ticket isn't any better either  edit: The chick Hillary Clinton is allegedly banging is pretty fucking hot. Oh come on. If not Hillary, then no Obama or Kuc?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
sitzkrieg
|
 |
« Reply #8 on: January 03, 2008, 01:09:34 PM » |
|
http://www.digg.com/2008_us_elections/Ron_Paul_Does_Not_Accept_Evolution_2http://informationparadox.blogspot.com/2007/12/ron-paul-does-not-accept-evolution.htmlAhhh, good to know that we have another Bible thumping SCIENCE DENYING presidential candidate to vote for. As if we didn't learn our lesson the first time... Ron Paul also doesn't accept a woman's right to choose, the concept of the separation of church and state, and an individual's right to privacy in sexual matters. Take a look at his "We The People Act" if you don't believe me: The Supreme Court of the United States and each Federal court-- (1) shall not adjudicate-- (A) any claim involving the laws, regulations, or policies of any State or unit of local government relating to the free exercise or establishment of religion; (B) any claim based upon the right of privacy, including any such claim related to any issue of sexual practices, orientation, or reproduction; or (C) any claim based upon equal protection of the laws to the extent such claim is based upon the right to marry without regard to sex or sexual orientation; and http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c109:h4379: All of this directly contradicts the First Amendment and the Fourteenth Amendment which guarantees all citizens equal protection under the law. Ron Paul isn't a Libertarian or a Constitutionalist. In reality, he's a far right-wing, fundamentalist, deconstructionist who would like to turn the country into a theocracy. I would really like to hear the Ron Paul supporters answer to this, if they have one? So much for the republican ticket. Guiliani... you'd have to pay me to vote for him, and the rest I wouldn't piss on if they were on fire. The democrat ticket isn't any better either  edit: The chick Hillary Clinton is allegedly banging is pretty fucking hot. Oh come on. If not Hillary, then no Obama or Kuc? I'd vote Bush for a 3rd term before I voted for Kuc. I think the man is really that retarded. Edwards is a joke. He rails about special interest groups, while happily taking money from unions.. which last I checked, are special interest groups. Hillary does whatever the polls tell her to do and plays too heavily on the experience-by-association card. I'd rather Bill ran again instead of her. Obama I actually like, but he's got some views I can't agree with, and is a bit naive. So maybe Obama, depending on who he picks for a running-mate I geuss. It's back to the southpark episode, voting for the Turd Sandwitch or the Giant Douche. If the choices totally suck, I'm buying an island, declaring indepedence, and immediately applying for foreign aid.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Daemok
Retired Mafia
Posting Like It's My Birthday
DKP: +23/-13
Online
Posts: 2495
|
 |
« Reply #9 on: January 03, 2008, 01:13:35 PM » |
|
I would go for Kuc but he will not get the nominee. From the sound of things Kuc may come along with Obama for the ride as his VP or so the rumor has been tossed around, that is if Obama gets the nominee.
Rom, Fuckabee, Gouliani, and McPain are all ass hats that open there mouth and shits comes out. Now I think its a very shallow view point for a intelligent man not to believe in evolution ( Paul ), but the fact is out of any of the other douches he would get my vote.
Like I said if its Obama/Kuc hopefully I won't have to worry, but if Billary takes the nominee no way in hell will I vote Dem. I think people should look at the past Bush-Clinton-Clinton-Bush-Bush- (possibly Clinton) and think a second, perhaps its time to get another person not in those 2 families into the oval office.
But then again, whether it be Dems or Repubs, majority of all politicians are lying to our faces and the main stream media completely supports and encourages them to do so.
Dae.
PS. Anyone who says they would vote for Bush again should be sent to Gitmo imo and have some fun getting water boarded.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 Ahhh F*cking HOFF-STYLE!!!
|
|
|
|
sitzkrieg
|
 |
« Reply #10 on: January 03, 2008, 01:37:50 PM » |
|
PS. Anyone who says they would vote for Bush again should be sent to Gitmo imo and have some fun getting water boarded.
Better than an insurgents interrogation center. They actually torture and kill people in those. The Isle of Sitz believes the geneva convention only applies when both sides are using it. Our immigration process is also unbelievably quick and smooth should you want to stay after your visit.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|